-
Previous Value Current Value Open
Closed
-
| Type |
Improvement
|
| Priority |
Normal
|
| Assignee | |
| Labels |
No labels
|
Issue Votes (0)
| Previous Value | Current Value |
|---|---|
Open | Closed |
| Type |
Improvement
|
| Priority |
Normal
|
| Assignee | |
| Labels |
No labels
|
It would be elegant if we could use an IN (and not IN) statement to query for fields as opposed to having to add various "and ..." statements