Support "IN()" for issue queries (OD-2095)
empinator opened 1 year ago

It would be elegant if we could use an IN (and not IN) statement to query for fields as opposed to having to add various "and ..." statements

"Type" in ("Bug", "Feature", "Improvement") and "Iteration" not in ("4.13.2", "4.13.1")
issue 1/1
Type
Improvement
Priority
Normal
Assignee
Labels
No labels
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (2)
Reference
OD-2095
Please wait...
Connection lost or session expired, reload to recover
Page is in error, reload to recover