|
Unknown opened 1 year ago
|
||||
|
Great to see you've made progresses. |
||||
|
|
BTW I am working on high availability currently. |
||||
|
|
Unfortunately, it the PR can be discarded. I am getting pretty fed up of pacman doing stuff for no reason other than to annoy tf out of me! |
||||
|
|
time to look for yet another alternative... the aur package works fine but I want to make it even better, and thats what I have been doing for 2 weeks... |
||||
|
|
What do you mean by high availability? multiple onedev instances (redundancy)? |
||||
|
|
Robin Shen changed state to 'Closed' 1 year ago
|
| Type |
Question
|
| Priority |
Normal
|
| Assignee |
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (3)
Hello,
How is onedev development going, haven't been around for a while. Still want to implement issue #972 when I get a chance though.
By the way, 2 months later and I am currently testing this: https://onedev.polarian.dev/polarrepo/onedev-bin/~pulls/12
This should provide seemless updating of the AUR package, which means, the AUR package will overtake the source package in usability as it should be as simple as install and update without any additional steps, why am I telling you this, because I wanted to say "I told you so" when you told me to give up packaging onedev :)
Note: this PR is untested and may not even work