Include a license for the documentation (#5)
Unknown opened 3 years ago

Currently the documentation is not licenced under any licence, this is not terrible but should be licenced under something like "open documentation licence"

  • Robin Shen commented 3 years ago

    I personally don't think this is necessary. I do not even remember I see this on any other projects.

  • Unknown commented 3 years ago

    All documentation somewhere has a licence in the smallprint, ArchWiki puts it at the bottom. Some other docs also put it at the bottom of the page.

    Its not a big deal, it just means any documentation is not protected by any sort of licence

  • Robin Shen commented 3 years ago

    As usual, contribution welcomed, 😃

  • Unknown commented 3 years ago

    May or may not have a PR ready to push :P

  • Robin Shen changed state to 'Closed' 3 years ago
    Previous Value Current Value
    Open
    Closed
issue 1/1
Type
Improvement
Priority
Minor
Assignee
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (2)
Reference
onedev/docs#5
Please wait...
Connection lost or session expired, reload to recover
Page is in error, reload to recover