|
Unknown opened 1 year ago
|
||||
|
I personally don't think this is necessary. I do not even remember I see this on any other projects. |
||||
|
|
All documentation somewhere has a licence in the smallprint, ArchWiki puts it at the bottom. Some other docs also put it at the bottom of the page. Its not a big deal, it just means any documentation is not protected by any sort of licence |
||||
|
|
As usual, contribution welcomed, 😃 |
||||
|
|
May or may not have a PR ready to push :P |
||||
|
|
Robin Shen changed state to 'Closed' 1 year ago
|
| Type |
Improvement
|
| Priority |
Minor
|
| Assignee |
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (2)
Currently the documentation is not licenced under any licence, this is not terrible but should be licenced under something like "open documentation licence"