Unknown
opened 4 years ago
-
I personally don't think this is necessary. I do not even remember I see this on any other projects.
-
All documentation somewhere has a licence in the smallprint, ArchWiki puts it at the bottom. Some other docs also put it at the bottom of the page.
Its not a big deal, it just means any documentation is not protected by any sort of licence
-
As usual, contribution welcomed, 😃
-
May or may not have a PR ready to push :P
-
Previous Value Current Value Open
Closed
| Type |
Improvement
|
| Priority |
Minor
|
| Assignee |
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (2)
Currently the documentation is not licenced under any licence, this is not terrible but should be licenced under something like "open documentation licence"